Ironclad C++

[Timon Gehr]

On 08/06/2013 05:13 PM, Kagamin wrote:
> On Tuesday, 6 August 2013 at 02:11:54 UTC, Timon Gehr wrote:
>> I thought I had demonstrated that it buys you more. It resolves the
>> problem that scoping is ambiguous and that there can be only one
>> 'inout' substitution per function application.
>
> It may look ambiguous to someone who doesn't know, how the feature
> works, because it's implicit, which, again, is a tradeoff. Subjective
> ambiguity should be solvable with better docs, learning resources and
> tutorials.
> ...

???

Nothing subjective about this! Even DMD does not know how the feature 
works in this case.