parseJSON bug

[Wyatt]

On Thursday, 8 August 2013 at 13:56:15 UTC, Dicebot wrote:
> On Thursday, 8 August 2013 at 13:49:22 UTC, bearophile wrote:
>> In my opinion we should follow the formal JSON grammar.
>
> This. Anyone who wants JavaScript behavior can use own 
> third-party library bust standard library must behave according 
> to published standards and specifications.

Then my reading says this really _is_ a bug. At least, according 
to http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc4627.txt, which states and shows 
only that:
"Insignificant whitespace is allowed before or after any of the 
six structural characters."

..unless there's a different version that supersedes that one?

-Wyatt