On Friday, 9 August 2013 at 14:51:05 UTC, Tyler Jameson Little
wrote:
> Also, I don't particularly like for_reverse, since you can't
> use a traditional for-loop syntax with for_reverse:
>
> // would be syntax error
> for_reverse (i = 0; i < 5; i++) {}
What do you think would be proper semantics for this?