UFCS for templates

[eles]

On Friday, 9 August 2013 at 13:36:44 UTC, monarch_dodra wrote:
> On Friday, 9 August 2013 at 11:46:42 UTC, eles wrote:
>> On Friday, 9 August 2013 at 11:30:54 UTC, anonymous wrote:
>>> On Friday, 9 August 2013 at 00:34:31 UTC, JS wrote:
>>>> On Thursday, 8 August 2013 at 17:55:04 UTC, Dicebot wrote:
>>> [...]
>>>>> As always, providing motivating use case and advantage/cost 
>>>>> comparison is usual requirement to make something happen.
>>>>>
>>>>> DIP's exist for a reason.
>>>>
>>>> Are you not smart enough to come up with use cases yourself?
>>>
>>> On Friday, 9 August 2013 at 03:29:20 UTC, JS wrote:
>>>> On Friday, 9 August 2013 at 00:57:21 UTC, Mike Parker wrote:
>>
> Really, all I'm seeing is "I have this proposal; fuck you if 
> you don't think it's good, I don't have any time to waste to 
> explain it to you"... Well, in that case, OK. I don't have time 
> to consider it either. Moving on.

Look, sorry to resurrect this thread, but I don't see only that.
I would have replied to such kind of proposal in the following
manner:

"Hey, cool that you were thinking about that! Could you come with
a better example, please? It could be an interesting proposal,
just develop it a bit more."

Let's not forget that sparks on either side are just as harmful.