Future of string lambda functions/string predicate functions

[Mr. Anonymous]

On Wednesday, 14 August 2013 at 14:36:25 UTC, H. S. Teoh wrote:
> A computer doesn't mind if its programs are put to purposes 
> that don't match their names. -- D. Knuth

Heh :)
Sometimes I read your replies just for the signature.

On the topic, I think the variant with the operators is more 
straightforward, e.g.:
> 	less		// a < b
op!"<"
> 	less!(5)	// a < 5
op!"<"(5)

etc.