std.serialization: pre-voting review / discussion

[Jacob Carlborg]

On 2013-08-14 21:40, H. S. Teoh wrote:

> Would it be possible to present a range *interface*, that currently just
> converts to array (or aliases to array if it's already an array), so
> that in the future, when std.xml is revamped to use ranges, existing
> code will automatically reap the benefits?

Since std.xml returns the data as a string, you mean I just forward the 
range interface to this string?

-- 
/Jacob Carlborg