A Discussion of Tuple Syntax

[Meta]

On Monday, 19 August 2013 at 20:46:02 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu 
wrote:
> It's stuff like this that's just useless and gives a bad 
> direction to the whole discussion. There's hardly anything 
> wrong with auto x = t1[2] or auto gr = t1[1], but once the 
> bikeshed is up for painting, the rainbow won't suffice.

I started this discussion to build on Kenji's DIP, which 
discusses destructuring and pattern matching syntax in addition 
to tuple literal syntax, as well as the previous discussion 
that's already gone on in the two "DIP discussion" threads. Are 
you saying that you dislike the destructuring/pattern matching 
discussion as a whole?