s/type tuple/template pack/g please

[deadalnix]

On Wednesday, 21 August 2013 at 17:53:21 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu 
wrote:
> There's an inordinate amount of confusion around what we 
> currently call "type tuple" (embodied in std's TypeTuple). I've 
> been furious immediately as I got word that Walter called it 
> that way, and it hasn't failed to make everybody else feel the 
> same over the years.
>
> So: shall we use "template pack" going forward exclusively 
> whenever we refer to that stuff? That way we can unambiguously 
> use "tuple" for "value tuples, i.e. like mini-structs that 
> group values together".
>
> Destroy. I mean criticize.
>

Many people started to use the sequence term. I think we should 
stick for that one.

Pack is kind of misleading IMO, as they automagically unpack.

So template argument sequence. If they happen to all be 
types/alias/values, types/alias/values sequence.