s/type tuple/template pack/g please

[Dicebot]

On Thursday, 22 August 2013 at 13:39:25 UTC, Jakob Ovrum wrote:
> I'm fine with any name but would like to point out that it's 
> probably essential that the new name allows for the distinction 
> between what we currently call type tuples and expression/mixed 
> tuples. The latter are not so important to distinguish, but 
> type tuples have the privilege of being able to declare an 
> expression tuple:
>
>     TypeTuple!(int, string) myExpressionTuple;
>     myExpressionTuple[0] = 42;
>     myExpressionTuple[1] = "foo";
>     // etc


One extra source of confusion is that "expression tuple" was 
often used for TypeTuple!(42, "foo") ones, not for runtime 
instances. Those two are very different in D. That is why I am 
saying one name is not enough and some classification is needed.