Download page needs a tidy up

[Manu]

On 22 August 2013 17:33, Jacob Carlborg <doob at me.com> wrote:

> On 2013-08-22 05:33, Manu wrote:
>
>  I was also briefly confused by the 32bit/64bit scattered everywhere. My
>> initial assumption was that it specified the toolchain's target
>> architecture :/
>> But since it's the compiler's host arch, I'd say that for Windows where
>> 32bit binaries will run on any version of windows and no 64bit binary is
>> offered, and OSX which has only ever been 64bit, there's no need to
>> write it for those platforms. It's just confusing.
>>
>
> The architecture are basically never mentioned for Mac OS X downloads.
> Because everyone assumes universal binaries that will work everywhere.


... what?
Isn't that what I just said?
Did you actually look at Brad's page upgrade?
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.puremagic.com/pipermail/digitalmars-d/attachments/20130823/055953fa/attachment.html>