s/type tuple/template pack/g please

[deadalnix]

On Thursday, 22 August 2013 at 13:43:47 UTC, Dicebot wrote:
> On Thursday, 22 August 2013 at 13:39:25 UTC, Jakob Ovrum wrote:
>> I'm fine with any name but would like to point out that it's 
>> probably essential that the new name allows for the 
>> distinction between what we currently call type tuples and 
>> expression/mixed tuples. The latter are not so important to 
>> distinguish, but type tuples have the privilege of being able 
>> to declare an expression tuple:
>>
>>    TypeTuple!(int, string) myExpressionTuple;
>>    myExpressionTuple[0] = 42;
>>    myExpressionTuple[1] = "foo";
>>    // etc
>
>
> One extra source of confusion is that "expression tuple" was 
> often used for TypeTuple!(42, "foo") ones, not for runtime 
> instances. Those two are very different in D. That is why I am 
> saying one name is not enough and some classification is needed.

That is in the doc : "A Tuple whose elements consist entirely of 
types is called a TypeTuple. A Tuple whose elements consist 
entirely of expressions is called an ExpressionTuple. "

http://dlang.org/template.html#TemplateTupleParameter