s/type tuple/template pack/g please

[Jakob Ovrum]

On Thursday, 22 August 2013 at 13:53:45 UTC, Dicebot wrote:
> Almost, but not completely. They share implementation and much 
> of observable behavior (and former can be used to initialize 
> latter) but one is mutable run-time entity and other - 
> compile-time (and thus, of course, constant). As they don't 
> have proper representation in the type system, it makes them 
> quite different.

I don't think it's correct or useful to label one as compile-time 
and the other as runtime. I think the mutability or immutability 
of the expression tuple is an obvious result of its lvalue-ish or 
rvalue-ish nature, respectively. As such - with the current 
semantics - I'm not sure it's important to be able to easily 
distinguish the two. I'd be happy to be convinced otherwise if 
you think it's important.