std.serialization: pre-voting review / discussion

[ilya-stromberg]

On Wednesday, 28 August 2013 at 16:10:03 UTC, Dicebot wrote:
> There was a good proposal by Dmitry to separate sequential 
> strict serialization for random-access one as two distinct 
> entities. I like it and I think it that is also can solve your 
> problem.

The problem is not only my. Actually, I didn't use C# 
serialization due this problem - any minimal code change breaks 
all previously serialized data. But I used .Net 1, maybe in 
current version solve this.
Can you print the link, please?