Replacing std.xml

[Chris]

On Thursday, 29 August 2013 at 09:24:31 UTC, Joakim wrote:
> I think it's great that there's no std.xml, as it implies that 
> nobody using D would use a dumb tech like XML.  Let's keep it 
> that way. :)

No way around XML. A must have, as has been said in this thread. 
But what would you suggest as a better alternative to XML. It 
might be worth creating modules for alternative too (like JSON).