Experimental approach to reference-type random number generators

[monarch_dodra]

On Friday, 30 August 2013 at 13:32:31 UTC, Dmitry Olshansky wrote:
> Now I'm in the same boat in the midst of wrok of applying new 
> std.uni facilities to std.regex. As soon as std.array.array 
> started using trusted lambda internally it doesn't accept any 
> range with destructor.

Is the bug specific to trusted lambdas? I mean, would simply 
using a named function work around the problem?

If so, then we should simply patch array immediately, while 
waiting for a lambda improvement. Having a broken 
"std.array.array" is problematic for everyone...