D vs Go in real life, part 2. Also, Erlang.
Dicebot
public at dicebot.lv
Wed Dec 4 08:20:00 PST 2013
On Wednesday, 4 December 2013 at 13:50:52 UTC, Atila Neves wrote:
> I'd have to dig in and see data to be convinced it's the GC
> making the latency worse than the C implementation, but from
> what I know you've got more experience with this so who knows :)
I am also not proficient enough with GC stuff to actually prove
that but it fitted observations during my own tests pretty well.
But I am not 100% sure.
> Doing this on a real network was waaay more work than I was
> willing to put up with for something a colleague said during
> lunch break, so it was done on localhost. The h/w is a Core i7
> Lenovo laptop (W530) with 8GB of RAM running Arch Linux. My
> server code can be found at https://github.com/atilaneves/mqtt,
> the C implementation has its own website: http://mosquitto.org/.
Ah this is rather sad. It makes tests results somewhat unstable
because client load interferes with server load. Ideally client
should be separate machine and has more powerful h/w than server.
However, that also requires ~gigabit network in between as well
as matching network cards to hit the limits of top server
performance - this makes such tests rather cumbersome to execute.
At the very least you should use process affinity to separate
resources between client and server in more predictable manner.
More information about the Digitalmars-d
mailing list