DIP 52 - Implicit conversions

[deadalnix]

On Wednesday, 11 December 2013 at 12:44:52 UTC, Simen Kjærås 
wrote:
> http://wiki.dlang.org/DIP52
>
> Abstract:
> Implicit conversion to and from other types are useful, and is 
> to some extent covered by existing language features. Some 
> cases are currently not covered, but could be worthy additions 
> to the toolbox.
>
> I've tried to figure out good ways to add some sorely-needed 
> implicit conversions to the language, but I'm sure there are 
> details that need to be ironed out. In other words - destroy!
>
> --
>   Simen

Implicit conversion has proven to be a really bad idea in C++. 
What make your solution superior to existing ones ?