DIP 52 - Implicit conversions

[Meta]

On Thursday, 12 December 2013 at 09:15:56 UTC, Simen Kjærås wrote:
> C++ has shown that having implicit conversion *by default* is a 
> really bad idea. For instance, C# also has implicit conversion, 
> but you have explicitly ask for it. If there's any critique of 
> that anywhere (I expect there to be), I've been unable to find 
> it.

...Explicitly implicit conversions?