DIP53 and DIP49 (ver2) - New definitions for qualified constructors and postblits
deadalnix
deadalnix at gmail.com
Thu Dec 19 16:41:58 PST 2013
On Thursday, 19 December 2013 at 15:32:33 UTC, Kenji Hara wrote:
> I think it is necessary small learning cost, to keep language
> semantics
> simple.
>
> Kenji Hara
If that is an extra learning cost, doesn't it make the semantic
more complex, almost by definition ?
I'm also against adding a new meaning to const, especially when
its current meaning can make sense.
More information about the Digitalmars-d
mailing list