DIP54 : revamp of Phobos tuple types

[Jakob Ovrum]

On Tuesday, 24 December 2013 at 04:48:57 UTC, Jakob Ovrum wrote:
> [1] Assuming that the case for non-auto-expanding lists can be 
> argued sufficiently for inclusion in Phobos, which is yet to be 
> seen. This DIP doesn't seem to even try.

Clarification: "Assuming that the case for non-auto-expanding 
lists can be
> argued sufficiently for inclusion in Phobos, in the context of 
> list algorithms that take a variadic number of variadic lists 
> as arguments."

I feel that non-expanding lists only make sense in the context of 
these niche algorithms for the reasons explained in the parent 
post, and thus do not warrant conflation with auto-expanding 
lists.