Possible @property compromise

[Zach the Mystic]

On Saturday, 2 February 2013 at 06:28:47 UTC, Era Scarecrow wrote:
>  It would refuse to compile as a static function can't point to 
> an instance/parent. I'm convinced you should not be able to 
> return (or create an instance of) a nested struct outside of 
> it's level of control or ability to reference properly.

Does my suggested way of doing it not do this?