DIP23 draft: Fixing properties redux
Andrei Alexandrescu
SeeWebsiteForEmail at erdani.org
Sun Feb 3 19:06:27 PST 2013
On 2/3/13 9:23 PM, kenji hara wrote:
> 2013/2/4 Andrei Alexandrescu <SeeWebsiteForEmail at erdani.org
> <mailto:SeeWebsiteForEmail at erdani.org>>
>
> On 2/3/13 3:16 AM, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
> [snip]
>
> Some more thinking got me to three simple principles that guide the
> proposed property design:
>
> http://wiki.dlang.org/DIP23#__In_a_nutshell
> <http://wiki.dlang.org/DIP23#In_a_nutshell>
>
>
> > 2. A @property may have EXACTLY ONE or EXACTLY TWO parameters,
> counting the implicit this parameter if at all. The ONE-parameter
> version is ALWAYS a getter, and the TWO-parameter version is ALWAYS a
> setter. There's no variadics, defaulted parameters, and such.
>
> Unfortunately, I can present a counterexample.
>
> struct S {
> static int value;
> static @property int foo() { return value; }
> static @property void foo(int n) { value = n; }
>
> }
> void main() {
> int n = S.foo;
> S.foo = 1;
> }
>
> Should they be disallowed, as like module level properties?
Yes. No static properties.
Andrei
More information about the Digitalmars-d
mailing list