proposal to disambiguate &a.fun: disable optional parenthesis INSIDE &() expression

[Andrei Alexandrescu]

On 2/4/13 8:37 AM, FG wrote:
> On 2013-02-04 11:20, monarch_dodra wrote:
>> As I asked in the other thread: What is the point of even allowing
>> taking the
>> address of a property function? If a property is designed as something
>> that can
>> encapsulate and emulate a field, then it makes to sense to get the
>> address of
>> the getter (As far as I can tell).
>
> Yes, but this is not just about properties but also normal functions:

Hah! I swear I posted before seeing this :o).

Andrei