DIP23 draft: Fixing properties redux
Andrej Mitrovic
andrej.mitrovich at gmail.com
Mon Feb 4 07:44:39 PST 2013
On 2/4/13, Dmitry Olshansky <dmitry.olsh at gmail.com> wrote:
> Unary & is not overloadable, precisely due to confusing mess it can
> create (see C++).
Right I overlooked that, but this new rule will introduce a confusing
mess as well. Anyway my vote is firmly against it. If anything we
should have a vote on it before someone starts hacking on master
without us knowing about it (UDA's, anyone?).
More information about the Digitalmars-d
mailing list