Possible @property compromise

[Zach the Mystic]

On Friday, 1 February 2013 at 19:59:12 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer 
wrote:
> Well, we can disagree, but you still haven't explained why it's 
> fundamental.  Other languages have implemented properties just 
> fine without having to specify that they are structs or 
> aggregate types.  Until you come up with a compelling reason 
> for structs, I'll stand by my position.

Do you mind if I put my arguments in a new thread?