std.xml validity checking is absurd

[Jacob Carlborg]

On 2013-02-07 23:35, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
> std.xml itself is known to be absurd. I haven't used it myself,
> but there's been a general consensus for years that it needs a complete
> rewrite. Attempts have been started, but nobody's finished one,
> AFAIK. You could try the XML module in Tango, it's supposed to be
> ridiculously fast.

It is fast, but it doesn't perform any validations. I have no idea what 
happens if pass invalid XML to it.

-- 
/Jacob Carlborg