Request for comments: std.d.lexer

[Brian Schott]

On Friday, 8 February 2013 at 15:23:00 UTC, Brian Schott wrote:
> On Friday, 8 February 2013 at 15:12:23 UTC, Jacob Carlborg 
> wrote:
>> DMD is still consistently faster, :(
>
> We might be getting to the part where we say that code 
> generated by gcc is still consistently faster than code 
> generated by ldc.

For the lulz I compiled with "dmd -release -inline -noboundscheck 
-O -m64 -property":

http://hackerpilot.github.com/experimental/std_lexer/images/times3-dmd.png

Yes, dmd vs ldc actually is a matter of 32 vs 18 ms for datetime.