Possible regression (2.060 -> 2.061) with member access
Dicebot
m.strashun at gmail.com
Sat Feb 9 07:55:12 PST 2013
On Saturday, 9 February 2013 at 15:52:04 UTC, Benjamin Thaut
wrote:
> Am 09.02.2013 16:40, schrieb kenji hara:
>>
>> You can use built-in 'tupleof' property, which still bypass
>> access
>> modifier.
>>
>
> Will they continue to do so, or will this also be fixed? We
> should at least have some way to do low level work like
> serialization.
>
> Kind Regards
> Benjamin Thaut
According to my private-related DIP - yes, they will continue,
and there have been no objections on this part.
More information about the Digitalmars-d
mailing list