Possible regression (2.060 -> 2.061) with member access

Dicebot m.strashun at gmail.com
Sat Feb 9 07:55:12 PST 2013


On Saturday, 9 February 2013 at 15:52:04 UTC, Benjamin Thaut 
wrote:
> Am 09.02.2013 16:40, schrieb kenji hara:
>>
>> You can use built-in 'tupleof' property, which still bypass 
>> access
>> modifier.
>>
>
> Will they continue to do so, or will this also be fixed? We 
> should at least have some way to do low level work like 
> serialization.
>
> Kind Regards
> Benjamin Thaut

According to my private-related DIP - yes, they will continue, 
and there have been no objections on this part.


More information about the Digitalmars-d mailing list