Possible regression (2.060 -> 2.061) with member access
Nick Sabalausky
SeeWebsiteToContactMe at semitwist.com
Sat Feb 9 12:51:46 PST 2013
On Sat, 9 Feb 2013 21:34:54 +0100
Andrej Mitrovic <andrej.mitrovich at gmail.com> wrote:
> On 2/9/13, kenji hara <k.hara.pg at gmail.com> wrote:
> > It's introduced by fixing issue 5385, so at least not a regression
>
> Perhaps we could relax the rule and allow bypassing access
> restrictions when using typeof().
I think that's asking for confusion to have different visibility rules
inside and outside typeof().
The typical way to access private members when really needed is via a
reflection mechanism, and we already have a way to do that as two
people have mentioned.
More information about the Digitalmars-d
mailing list