Possible regression (2.060 -> 2.061) with member access

[Nick Sabalausky]

On Sat, 9 Feb 2013 21:34:54 +0100
Andrej Mitrovic <andrej.mitrovich at gmail.com> wrote:

> On 2/9/13, kenji hara <k.hara.pg at gmail.com> wrote:
> > It's introduced by fixing issue 5385, so at least not a regression
> 
> Perhaps we could relax the rule and allow bypassing access
> restrictions when using typeof().

I think that's asking for confusion to have different visibility rules
inside and outside typeof().

The typical way to access private members when really needed is via a
reflection mechanism, and we already have a way to do that as two
people have mentioned.