DIP25 draft available for destruction

[Tove]

On Wednesday, 6 February 2013 at 21:40:00 UTC, Andrei 
Alexandrescu wrote:
> On 2/6/13 3:02 PM, Andrej Mitrovic wrote:
>> Also the DIP argues that addressOf solves the @property issue 
>> w.r.t.
>> return values. I've proposed we use an .addressOf property 
>> which only
>> works on @property functions, and I saw no arguments against 
>> it.
>
> There aren't, but a library approach is better than a magic 
> work, all other things being equal.
>
>
> Andrei

struct S
{
   @property int var();
   @property void var(int);
}

The .addressOf property gave me the idea of solving the 
getter/setter issue, by having two properties...

var.getter
var.setter

maybe it could be added to your library approach though?