What's missing from Phobos for Orbit (package manager)

[Jacob Carlborg]

On 2013-02-12 17:53, Peter Sommerfeld wrote:

> That seems to be a question of priority: If you insist to get the
> dependencies into phobos first it will take some time until that
> happens, may be never or parts of it only.
>
> A solution for now seems to be to pack the dependencies into Orbit
> and later push parts of it into phobos. That will establish an API
> which defines the d-package manager, provided it is accepted by
> Walter and Andre. Your decision...

It's not so much about priority, it's rather about if being accepted at all.

-- 
/Jacob Carlborg