What's missing from Phobos for Orbit (package manager)

[Dmitry Olshansky]

15-Feb-2013 12:47, Jacob Carlborg пишет:
>> I'd say if contributor can't be bothered to follow conventions and deal
>> with the constraints imposed, just let him go. Coherency is all
>> important in the core part of pretty much anything.
>
> If you want to create a new zip and xml modules even though there
> already exist perfectly good and working ones, go ahead.

I'd go for it iff I'm sure I can do better. But that's a re-hash of 
balance between NIH/from scratch approach vs reuse & tap into somebody 
else infrastructure.

> I don't want to
> waste time on that.
>

Looks like the key point.

-- 
Dmitry Olshansky