dlangspec.pdf?

[Philippe Sigaud]

On Sat, Jan 5, 2013 at 11:20 PM, Walter Bright
<newshound2 at digitalmars.com>wrote:

> On 1/5/2013 1:38 PM, Philippe Sigaud wrote:
>
>>     It is a strange sublanguage. It has its problems, but compared to
>> what D
>>     documentation was like before Ddoc, it is a HUGE and incalculable
>> leap forward.
>>
>>
>> I was just wondering if there was a way to make it a bit more D-ish. The
>> $(NAME
>> arg, arg) syntax feels like I'm entering another land  when I have to use
>> it.
>>
>
> You are entering another land with it. Text processing is totally
> different, and it should be different.
>

I'm not convinced, but that's not really important.

>
> They aren't really much different from the website macros. In fact, the D
> ebook is created out of the same source files the website is. The macros to
> do it are all in github.


Also, Phobos/index.d is sadly in HTML, not in Ddoc.
>>
>
> All those source files are on github.
>

I must be tired, because the only .ddoc file I find is std.ddoc. No .d
article on templates, etc: only the .html files.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.puremagic.com/pipermail/digitalmars-d/attachments/20130105/48bdc106/attachment.html>