manual memory management

[Mehrdad]

On Wednesday, 9 January 2013 at 10:31:51 UTC, deadalnix wrote:
> On Wednesday, 9 January 2013 at 10:19:24 UTC, Mehrdad wrote:
>> Yes I did, but I didn't realize you were talking about a 
>> background GC, sorry.
>>
>> Yeah, if you can have a background GC that can keep up with 
>> your needs, then the world is great. Trouble is, I don't see 
>> how that can be true for a intensive applications like games.
>
> You are changing the subject discussed every 2 posts. I'm 
> loosing my time here, that will be my last answer to you.


That wasn't my intention, but the subject suddenly changed to 
background GCs which I didn't expect to be talking about 
either... but if you don't have the time to continue then I'll 
avoid responding too.