More magical AA semantics

[Jonathan M Davis]

On Saturday, January 12, 2013 13:46:57 monarch_dodra wrote:
> On Saturday, 12 January 2013 at 12:41:12 UTC, Jonathan M Davis
> 
> wrote:
> > My gripe with
> > something like ++a[0] working when there's no a[0] is that
> > you'd be adding to
> > an element that doesn't exist yet.
> > 
> > - Jonathan M Davis
> 
> Not to mention, if "++" throws, I bet you'd insert T.init in
> a[0]. I don't see it behaving any other way.

Which is precisely one of the AA bugs that I'm most annoyed with:

aa[0] = funcThatThrows();

inserts T.init at aa[0].

- Jonathan M Davis