Exceptional coding style
monarch_dodra
monarchdodra at gmail.com
Wed Jan 16 11:25:50 PST 2013
On Wednesday, 16 January 2013 at 19:06:47 UTC, Mehrdad wrote:
> On Wednesday, 16 January 2013 at 18:57:06 UTC, mist wrote:
>>
>> This is a single template operator in D so it kind of solves
>> the problem. First is tricky, but is exactly the reason
>> sometimes types from external libs are used only via
>> alias/typedef. I'd prefer something like
>> :%s/boost::unord/std::unord/g though :) But well, if you are
>> working with C++, then templates and mixins will hardly solve
>> most problems of course, because C++ templates sucks and
>> mixins do not even exist there.
>
>
>
> Yeah I'm working in C++, not D.
>
>
> But even if I was using D, there's no way in heck that I would
> use a _MIXIN_ for that:
>
> mixin("I'm not sure how this is supposed too be
> readable").unordered_map!(int) a;
>
> makes no sense to me at all, when I could just as well have
> said 'boost'.
>
>
>
> Also, the search/replace thing won't work so well for any
> real-world example (the second one is a lot closer to what I
> had in mind... you can't just replace "T" with "T, U" and
> expect it to work).
>
>
> So my point is: no, it's not a simple matter of abstracting
> things away. Lined-up text really DOES make certain tasks
> easier than they would be otherwise.
++1.
Also, regular expressions ;)
More information about the Digitalmars-d
mailing list