D popularity

[Timon Gehr]

On 01/22/2013 12:42 AM, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
> ...
>
> It doesn't sound at all like it's an epitome of dynamic language,
> then. The *core* of it might be, but if it both provides *and*
> encourages you to use static typing, then if you choose to do so,
> you're clearly NOT doing dynamic programming - you're doing
> static programming. I don't see how using a static type system can ever
> be accurately called "dynamic programming".
>

I'm doing it all the time. :P
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dynamic_programming