@property - take it behind the woodshed and shoot it?

[deadalnix]

On Friday, 25 January 2013 at 11:00:34 UTC, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
> On 2013-01-25 01:55, kenji hara wrote:
>> I can imagine a situation that we might not want to treat 
>> property
>> functions as DATAs simply.
>>
>> If you have a struct which have some property functions as 
>> members, and
>> you'd want to serialize it:
>>
>> struct S {
>>    int value_;
>>    @property int value() { return value_; }
>> }
>>
>> At least, the serialization library should recognize the 
>> S.value is a
>> _property function_, not a int DATA.
>
> A serialization library would only recognize "value_" since 
> it's an instance variable.

getFields/getProperties/getMethods and you are done. It don't 
sounds that much of a problem to me.