Fixing module-scope private
mist
none at none.none
Sat Jan 26 14:23:04 PST 2013
There was discussion recently about unpleasant name conflict
possible with private module symbols. I have just encountered a
sarcastically false statement on dlang.org : "Private module
members are equivalent to static declarations in C programs."
Made me sad and wondering: was there any DIP after that thread or
it has ended, as it often happens, with a decision to "plan
carefully"? In latter case I may try to write one.
More information about the Digitalmars-d
mailing list