@property - take it behind the woodshed and shoot it?

[Jacob Carlborg]

On 2013-01-27 13:52, Artur Skawina wrote:

> It overloads the keywords, but afaict should be unambiguous and is not
> worse than the other meanings of 'in' (operator, modifier). But I haven't
> really used contracts w/ D (the basic features need to work right first,
> before worrying about extras like that); somebody who actually uses them
> would be in a better position to determine if overloading 'in' and 'out'
> further would be too confusing.

I'm not talking about confusing. I'm thinking if it's ambiguous or not 
and how to attach contracts to a property with this syntax.

-- 
/Jacob Carlborg