Inconsistency in CPU version symbols

[Johannes Pfau]

Am Sun, 27 Jan 2013 16:14:19 +0000
schrieb Iain Buclaw <ibuclaw at ubuntu.com>:

> >
> > Are Thumb1 systems still relevant today? I'm not too familiar with
> > Thumb,
> so forgive my ignorance here. If we still do need to care about
> Thumb1, then OK.
> >
> >
> 
> I seem to recall thumb being mostly 16bit systems.

Really? AFAIK ARM has always been 32bit or more. Thumb only limits
instruction size to 16bit, the registers are still 32bit.