Property discussion wrap-up

[Timon Gehr]

On 01/27/2013 10:47 PM, Zach the Mystic wrote:
> ...
> Okay, I was ignorant of that, and it's a bad example. I'm not going to
> pretend I know everything. But the man issue is to make ambiguous cases
> an error and not silently accepted as one or the other. If there aren't
> very many, or even any, then great, it's a non-issue.
> ...

In the absence of language rules, every sequence of characters has an 
ambiguous meaning. It is only ambiguous to you because you seem not 
aware of the rule that states that free-standing function names are an 
alternative notation for argument-less calls.