Incorporating D

[Namespace]

On Monday, 28 January 2013 at 15:15:38 UTC, Dejan Lekic wrote:
> On Friday, 25 January 2013 at 21:39:58 UTC, Namespace wrote:
>> On Friday, 25 January 2013 at 20:45:22 UTC, Szymon wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I would really like to start using D in our small company as a
>>> C++ replacement. With that in mind I do have few questions:
>>>
>>> 1) Is D2 really ready for production code?
>>
>> Not really. A big pain in the ass is the missing rvalue ref 
>> that C++ has. So using structs is a big disaster. But there 
>> are plenty of other missing features.
>
> Java has far less features than D, including what you complain 
> about, yet it is considered a pretty productive programming 
> language...

I hate to programming in Java because of the many many missing 
features.
And because _all_ is stored on the heap. Java is IMO only good 
(if any) for learning programming but nothing else.
But don't let us start a flame war about programming languages. ;)