Incorporating D

[John Colvin]

On Monday, 28 January 2013 at 12:04:42 UTC, Szymon wrote:
> On Saturday, 26 January 2013 at 21:30:22 UTC, mist wrote:
>> On Saturday, 26 January 2013 at 20:54:30 UTC, FG wrote:
>>> On 2013-01-26 20:55, SomeDude wrote:
>>>> AFAWK, at least one major videogames studio is writing its 
>>>> new title in D.
>>>
>>> For real? You must be joking. :)
>>
>> Tsss, it is a secret ;)
>
> We actually are video game company ;) That is why D seems like 
> perfect choice for future language. Native code + superb 
> programmer productivity + fast compile times. If D was bit more 
> mature decision would be dead simple.

I believe that if you stick with a particular version of the 
compiler + druntime + phobos then you could use D now.

If you treat it as a nicer c++ and don't branch out in to the 
more exotic features, I'd expect a pretty smooth ride.