@property needed or not needed?

[Dicebot]

On Monday, 28 January 2013 at 16:50:37 UTC, Maxim Fomin wrote:
> Than value of this expression (note, that evaluated expression 
> is not b, it is b = c) is assigned to a.

Quoting you (that was exactly part of standard I was referring 
too):
"assignment expression has the value of the left operand"

Left operand for (b = c) is b. Thus (b = c) has value of b. Value 
of b is b.getter(). Thus compiler is re-writing it wrong if we 
copy C rules.

> b.setter cannot be called prior to b.getter as in your example 
> #1 due to sequence rules. The example #2 would be for 
> expression a = c, b = c which is not a = b = c in the presence 
> of properties.

What sequence rules are you speaking about?