Possible @property compromise

[q66]

On Wednesday, 30 January 2013 at 00:26:11 UTC, q66 wrote:
> It deeply disturbs me that people even take the original post 
> seriously.

That said, obviously, propreties should be implemented in the 
library using opDot, with std.property implementing several 
property-handling policies and abstracted away in some kind of OO 
interface with inheritance to implement custom ones. That's gonna 
be awesome. Don't you think?