Regarding Issue 9423
Namespace
rswhite4 at googlemail.com
Wed Jan 30 03:17:29 PST 2013
On Wednesday, 30 January 2013 at 11:10:17 UTC, bearophile wrote:
> Currently you are allowed to write a lambda literal as in line
> 3, but you can't omit "ref" as in line 4:
>
>
> void foo(int delegate(ref int[1]) spam) {}
> void main() {
> foo((ref x) => 0); // line3, OK
> foo(x => 0); // line4, Error
> }
>
>
> Do you think "ref" annotation should be required at the call
> site?
>
> This is the Bugzilla thread. Hara has already implemented the
> "ref" inference, but he's not sure if it's a good idea:
>
> http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9423
>
> Bye,
> bearophile
I like it.
Would be a good time to require this for normal functions and
methods also. As C# it does.
More information about the Digitalmars-d
mailing list