Property discussion wrap-up
TommiT
tommitissari at hotmail.com
Wed Jan 30 11:44:42 PST 2013
On Wednesday, 30 January 2013 at 18:05:08 UTC, Zach the Mystic
wrote:
> [..]
How about using this new namespace_thingy keyword:
struct S
{
private int value;
namespace_thingy prop
{
int get() { return value; }
prop opAssign(int v) { value = v; return prop; }
// int data; // error: can't have data here
}
}
The compiler would implicitly create something like:
struct S
{
private int value;
int prop_get() { return value; }
int prop_opAssign(int v) { value = v; return prop_get(); }
}
...
S s;
int v1 = s.prop; // lowered to s.prop_get()
int v2 = (s.prop = v1); // lowered to s.prop_opAssign(v1)
assert(v1 == v2);
More information about the Digitalmars-d
mailing list