[:] as empty associative array literal, plus warning for null
bearophile
bearophileHUGS at lycos.com
Thu Jul 4 16:52:34 PDT 2013
Andrei Alexandrescu:
> Where does the whole "stronger typing" comes in? This is
> poppycock. We need real arguments here.
Maybe it's a matter of definitions, for me having "null" as
literal for empty array, null pointer, empty associative array,
and more is more weakly typed compared to having a literal like
[] usable only for empty dynamic arrays (and strings), a literal
as [:] usable only for empty associative arrays, and null for
pointers, class references (and little else like a Nullable).
Bye,
bearophile
More information about the Digitalmars-d
mailing list