GC.calloc

[David]

Am 18.07.2013 13:49, schrieb Daniel Murphy:
> "David" <d at dav1d.de> wrote in message news:ks6m33$o9b$1 at digitalmars.com...
>> Why doesn't GC.calloc follow the function signature of stdc.calloc?
>>
>> calloc(num, size_per_element)
>>
>> I think this should be changed, if no reason speaks against it, I can
>> look into changing this.
>> Of course this will break backwards compatability, but I think this is
>> worth it?
> 
> YES.  This is the memory corruption bug that I've been stuck on for the last 
> week in the DDMD port.
> 
> Thankyou so much for bringing this up, otherwise I'd still be stuck. 
> 
> 

Haha, glad I could help you! Looks like I am not the only one with this
problem.